The Fed faces economic uncertainty and political pressure as it decides
whether to cut rates
[September 15, 2025] By
CHRISTOPHER RUGABER
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a sign of how unusual this week's Federal Reserve
meeting is, the decision it will make on interest rates — usually the
main event — is just one of the key unknowns to be resolved when
officials gather Tuesday and Wednesday.
For now, it's not even clear who will be there. The meeting will likely
include Lisa Cook, an embattled governor, unless an appeals court or the
Supreme Court rules in favor of an effort by President Donald Trump to
remove her from office. And it will probably include Stephen Miran, a
top White House economic aide whom Trump has nominated to fill an empty
seat on the Fed's board. But those questions may not be resolved until
late Monday.
Meanwhile, the U.S. economy is mired in uncertainty. Hiring has slowed
sharply, while inflation remains stubbornly high.
So a key question for the Fed is: Do they worry more about people who
are out of work and struggling to find jobs, or do they focus more on
the struggles many Americans face in keeping up with rising costs for
groceries and other items? The Fed's mandate from Congress requires it
to seek both stable prices and full employment.
For now, Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed policymakers have
signaled the Fed is more concerned about weaker hiring, a key reason
investors expect the central bank will reduce its benchmark interest
rate by a quarter point on Wednesday to about 4.1%.

Still, stubbornly high inflation may force them to proceed slowly and
limit how many reductions they make. The central bank will also release
its quarterly economic projections Wednesday, and economists project
they will show that policymakers expect one or two additional cuts this
year, plus several more next year.
Ellen Meade, an economics professor at Duke University and former senior
economist at the Fed, said it's a stark contrast to the early pandemic,
when it was clear the Fed had to rapidly reduce rates to boost the
economy. And when inflation surged in 2021 and 2022, it was also a
straightforward call for the Fed, which moved quickly to raise borrowing
costs to combat higher prices.
But now, “it’s a tough time,” Meade said. “It would be a tough time,
even if the politics and the whole thing weren’t going on the way they
are, it would be a tough time. Some people would want to cut, some
people would not want to cut.”
Amid all the economic uncertainty, Trump is applying unprecedented
political pressure on the Fed, demanding sharply lower rates, seeking to
fire Cook, and insulting Powell, whom he has called a “numbskull,”
“fool,” and “moron.”
Loretta Mester, a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Cleveland and finance professor at the University of Pennsylvania's
Wharton School, said that Fed officials won't let the criticisms sway
their decisions on policy. Still, the attacks are unfortunate, she said,
because they threaten to undermine the Fed's credibility with the
public.
“Added to their list of the difficulty of making policy because of how
the economy is performing, they also have to contend with the fact that
there may be some of the public that’s skeptical about how they’ve gone
about making their decisions,” she said.

[to top of second column] |

Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, walks
at the White House, June 17, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex
Brandon, File)

David Andolfatto, an economics professor at the University of Miami and
former top economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said that
presidents have pressured Fed chairs before, but never as personally or
publicly.
“What’s unusual about this is the level of open disrespect and just
childishness,” Andolfatto said. “I mean, this is just beyond the pale.”
There are typically 12 officials who vote on the Fed's policies at each
meeting — the seven members of the Fed's board of governors, as well as
five of the 12 regional bank presidents, who vote on a rotating basis.
If a court rules that Cook can be fired, or Miran isn't approved in
time, then just 11 officials will vote on Wednesday. Either way, there
ought to be enough votes to approve a quarter-point cut, but there could
be an unusual amount of division.
Miran, if he is on the board, and Governor Michelle Bowman may dissent
in opposition to a quarter-point reduction in favor of a steeper
half-point cut.
There could be additional dissenting votes in the other direction,
potentially from regional bank presidents who might oppose any cuts at
all. Beth Hammack, president of the Fed's Cleveland branch, and Jeffrey
Schmid, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, have both
expressed concern that inflation has topped the Fed's 2% targer for more
than four years and is still elevated. If either votes against a cut, it
would be the first time there were dissents in both directions from a
Fed decision since 2019.
“This degree of division is unusual, but the circumstances are unusual,
too," Andolfatto said. “This is a situation central banks really don’t
like: The combination of inflationary pressure and labor market
weakness.”

Hiring has slowed in recent months, with employers shedding 13,000 jobs
in June and adding just 22,000 in August, the government reported
earlier this month. And last week a preliminary report from the Labor
Department showed that companies added far fewer jobs in the year ending
in March than previously estimated.
At the same time, inflation picked up a bit last month and remains above
the Fed's 2% target. According to the consumer price index, core prices
— excluding food and energy — rose 3.1% in August compared with a year
earlier..
With inflation still elevated, the Fed may have to proceed slowly with
any further cuts, which would likely further frustrate the Trump White
House.
“When you get to turning points, people can reasonably disagree about
when to go,” Meade said.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |