J&J wins trial over Florida woman who claimed its baby powder caused her
cancer
Send a link to a friend
 [April 19, 2024]
By Dietrich Knauth
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Florida jury on Thursday concluded that Johnson &
Johnson's baby powder talc product did not cause the ovarian cancer of a
Florida woman who died in 2019.
The lawsuit was brought by family members of Patricia Matthey, a
Sarasota County resident who used Johnson's baby powder daily from 1965
until August 2016, when she was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, according
to her family's lawsuit.
J&J's Worldwide Vice President of Litigation Erik Haas said the company
was vindicated by the jury's decision.
"Consistent with decades of scientific research, the jury appropriately
found that talc is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause
cancer, which is the same outcome the company achieved in 16 of 17
ovarian cases tried to date," Haas said.
Leigh O'Dell, an attorney for the Matthey family, said she respects the
jury's decision, but will remain "undeterred" in future cases against
J&J.
"The science supports the association between genital talc use and
ovarian cancer, and we will continue to seek justice for the victims of
J&J's neglect and indifference," O'Dell said.
Before her death, Matthey testified that advertisements for baby powder
made her think that she was "dirty and smelly" and that she "needed
Johnson's baby powder to be a good clean person," according to evidence
presented by her family's attorney Lance Oliver during the trial.
The Matthey family alleged that J&J knew for decades that the talc it
mined for use in baby powder could be contaminated with carcinogenic
asbestos fibers. J&J suppressed scientific evidence linking talc
products to increased cancer risk, according to the complaint.
J&J argued that there was no "conspiracy" to suppress research. Instead,
the scientific evidence simply does not support the Matthey family's
claims that its talc products cause cancer, according to J&J.
[to top of second column]
|
Bottles of Johnson & Johnson baby powder line a drugstore shelf in
New York October 15, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo
 "This is fundamentally a case about
science," J&J's attorney Morty Dubin said during opening statements
in the trial.
J&J faces more than 50,000 lawsuits over talc, most by women with
ovarian cancer, with a minority of the cases involving people with
mesothelioma. Asbestos exposure is a known cause of mesothelioma.
J&J has attempted to reach a comprehensive settlement of the talc
litigation through bankruptcy, but courts have rejected its two
previous attempts.
Haas has said that the company is considering a third bankruptcy
filing, and is trying to build more support for a bankruptcy
settlement among the plaintiffs that have sued the company.
Haas said on Thursday that J&J will "continue to defend the
meritless talc claims in the tort system," while those negotiations
continue.
J&J's bankruptcy strategy put the talc litigation on hold from 2021
to 2023, but trials have resumed after the latest bankruptcy case
was dismissed.
Trials in the talc cases have had a mixed record, with major
plaintiff wins including a $2.1 billion judgment in 2021 awarded to
22 women with ovarian cancer.
A New Jersey appeals court in October threw out a $223.7 million
verdict against the company, finding the testimony of the
plaintiffs' expert witnesses unsound. The most recent case to go to
trial ended in a hung jury on March 5.
J&J has recently settled some cases involving plaintiffs with
mesothelioma, but the company has not provided details about the
dollar amounts involved or said how many people they covered.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |
