Environmental group says Amtrak project impact assessment was ‘rushed’
[November 10, 2026]
By Sean Reed | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – Federal authorities have said a proposed Amtrak
maintenance facility project has the environmental all clear a little
over a week after conceding to local opposition over the perceived
impacts of the project locally.
The new facility would be built on an existing 2-mile-long railyard
owned, but decreasingly used, by Union Pacific.The stretch of rail
infrastructure in Bridgeport, near the Sox’s current home of Rate Field,
also runs adjacent to the Chinatown and Armour Square neighborhoods.
The project has been granted $659 million by the Federal Railroad
Administration and more than $125 million from future White Sox owner
Justin Ishbia through Canal Edge, his firm poised to develop a new White
Sox stadium on the site of Amtrak’s active railyard.
Hannah Dembosky, founder and co-lead of activist group Bridgeport
Environmentalist, told The Center Square that the Amtrak-conducted
environmental assessment wasn’t what opponents were asking for.
“We were worried that this was going to happen in a very rushed opaque
manner and unfortunately, with the release of these documents coming
around 10 or so days right after the announcement that they were going
to do the environmental assessment, that is basically what we're
seeing,” Dembosky said.
The assessment found the proposed site would have an “insignificant
impact” on the surrounding area. Demboski disputed the findings, noting
a variety of environmental issues that weren’t considered.
“We do think there's a lot of really gaping holes in what this report
looks at that very much paints Amtrak's project in a favorable light. A
shocker considering Amtrak's the one who put this together,” Dembosky
said.
She said things like particulate matter from diesel engines running near
hundreds of adjacent residents and loud generators were just some of the
issues.
Dembosky also suggested her organization thinks the current railyard to
the north would be a better investment for the federal government, while
potentially being less costly for taxpayers.
[to top of second column]
|
The other half of the issue Bridgeport residents and politicians see
is the financial interests of Ishbia.
Dembosky questioned the billionaire’s conflicting interests, the
haste to start the rail project, the timeline of both projects
aligning, and noted Ishbia and his family’s political contributions.
“He and his family have donated a large amount to, you know,
Republican campaigns in the midterms. I believe his family has
donated millions in the MAGA PAC. He himself donated a lot to [U.S.
Sen. Pete] Ricketts’ campaign in Nebraska,” Dembosky said.
Alderman Nicole Lee, who represents the 11th Ward where the planned
project is located, similarly criticized the haste with which the
assessment was completed in an online statement Saturday.
“This assessment process, which Amtrak and the FRA only agreed to
under intense pressure, is woefully insufficient. Amtrak and Canal
Edge, LLC have an explicit financial interest in ensuring this
project moves forward quickly,” Lee said.
The Amtrak project would begin as early as January, projected to be
complete around August 2028. The project was announced in mid-August
and Amtrak held fewer than a dozen public meetings to address public
concerns since.
Amtrak announced its plan for more public meetings to hear community
feedback, with virtual events and one in-person at the Illinois
Institute of Technology from 5-8 p.m. Dec. 2.
The federal project is required to take public comments for 30 days
on the environmental assessment, which are open online through Dec.
7.
 |
