Judge throws prosecutor out of court and orders leaders of NJ’s US
Attorney’s office to testify
[March 18, 2026]
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — Vexed by the Justice Department’s
chaotic oversight of federal prosecutions in New Jersey, a judge on
Monday threw a government attorney out of a hearing and ordered the
three officials in charge of the state’s U.S. Attorney’s office to
answer his questions under oath.
U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi lit into prosecutors after another
judge ruled last week that the Trump administration’s decision to
replace interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba with a trio of officials was
another violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, which
requires Senate confirmation.
The officials, Philip Lamparello, Jordan Fox and Ari Fontecchio, have
remained in charge pending an appeal.
Quraishi quizzed Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosenblum about his
office’s current management structure and whether Habba, a Justice
Department senior adviser, has any role in running the office, which she
has denied.
When Rosenblum’s supervising attorney interjected, Quraishi accused him
of trying to “blindside” the court and ordered him to leave or risk
being removed by court security officers.
The judge vented his frustrations as he was preparing to sentence a man
for possessing child sexual abuse material — a case that he said had
been compromised by a “sloppy investigation” and the U.S. attorney’s
office’s haste to reach a plea agreement. The sentencing was
rescheduled.
“You have lost the confidence and the trust of this Court,” Quraishi
told Rosenblum during a tense 22-minute hearing. “You have lost the
confidence and the trust of the New Jersey legal community, and you are
losing the trust and confidence of the public.”

The New York Times reported on the judge’s remarks and posted a
transcript of the proceeding to its website.
Chad Gilmartin, a spokesman for the Justice Department, told the Times:
“Unfortunately some judges are more interested in courtroom theatrics
and constitutional overreach than promoting public safety. It is an
especially troubling moment when a court chooses to sideline a case
involving child exploitation.”
Lamparello, Fox and Fontecchio, referred to by the judge and in court
records as “the triumvirate,” have remained in charge because the judge
who ruled to bar them, Matthew Brann, paused the decision from taking
immediate effect to give the government time to appeal.
[to top of second column]
|

Alina Habba speaks after being sworn in as interim US Attorney
General for New Jersey, in the Oval Office of the White House in
Washington, on March 28, 2025. (Pool File via AP, file)

But, Brann wrote in his 130-page opinion, “a stay cannot validate an
unlawful appointment” and that “If the Government chooses to leave
the triumvirate in place, it does so at its own risk.”
“Here is your risk. This is your risk,” said Quraishi, who was
appointed in 2021 by President Joe Biden, a Democrat.
The judge said he didn’t believe Rosenblum’s claim that Lamparello,
Fox and Fontecchio were still in charge and that no one else, such
as Habba, was influencing the office’s decision making.
Quraishi said he wouldn’t believe anything federal prosecutors told
him until the three officials testify before him in Trenton on May
4. If their answers aren’t satisfactory, the judge said he may
summon Habba and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the Justice
Department’s second-in-command, to testify.
Quraishi was hot from the start of Monday’s proceeding, laying into
Supervisory Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Coyne for appearing in
court without prior notice and for interrupting repeatedly without
permission.
“I’m not going to hear from you, Mr. Coyne. If you want to sit there
for moral support or hand Mr. Rosenblum Post-its or whisper in his
ear, I’ll let you do that as supervisor,” Quraishi said in one of
several dust ups before telling Coyne to leave.
The judge also questioned the judgment of prosecutors to reach a
plea agreement with the defendant in the child sexual abuse material
case before the FBI had finished searching his electronic devices.
The plea agreement calls for a “significantly lower” sentence than
prescribed by federal sentencing guidelines, Quraishi said.
“It was a sloppy investigation where, while you executed a plea
agreement, the FBI uncovered significantly more child pornography
that you couldn’t charge and now you’re stuck with a plea agreement
because you’re bound by it,” Quraishi said.
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved |